READ THE WINNING ENTRIES
 CLICK HERE

Lorraine Mace - Adjudicator.

Lorraine Mace is a columnist with Writing Magazine (UK) and a regular contributor to Queensland Writing (Australia). A former humour columnist for Living France and Spanish Magazine, her work has been published in five countries, as well as on the Web. Winner of the Petra Kenney 2006 Award (comic verse category), she writes fiction for the women’s magazine market, features for monthly magazines, is a writing judge, and a tutor for the Writers Bureau. She is the author of The Greatest Moving Abroad Tips in the World (Oct 2008) and co-author, with Maureen Vincent-Northam, of The ABC Checklist for New Writers. www.lorrainemace.com

Christmas Chillers Results

FIRST
Voices in the night
Liz Richards 

SECOND
The Interview 
Diane Waters 

THIRD
A Present for Mungo
Nicola Cleasby


HIGHLY COMMENDED
Living Doll 
Robbie Grieve
 Soldier, Soldier
Jay Smedley
A Christmas Wish
Felicity Cousins 


COMMENDED
Vessel For Vengeance
James Doggett
Fractured 
Stephen Barnard   

OTHER SHORT LISTED ENTRIES
Angelina  
Alexandra Stopford 
Part of the Family 
Gail Richards
Alexandria to Xanadu 
Janet Daniel 
Dolly Day Dream 
Jayne thickett 
Aunt Delphie’s Dolls
Ann Evans 
Aunt Delphie’s Legacy 
Winn Smith
The Dolls of Aunt Delphie Kenneth Knight 
Red Light
Carol MacAllister
A Baby’s Cry
Louise Blackah 
Living Dolls
Mark Pearce
Last Christmas at Pine Rise   Helen Belgian Cooper
Christmas at Tante Delphine’s  Beverly Jones 
Wishing Dolls
Keith Willey
Izzie
Milethia Thomas 
The Sleepover  
Nicola Perkins
The Greenham Common Affair  Rob Storey-Day 
Lady Killers
Jo Derrick
Little Girl Lost
Mike Snowdon
Christmas at Aunt Delphie’s  Anna McCormack

CHRISTMAS CHILLERS 2008
Adjudicator’s report by Lorraine Mace

I last judged the Christmas Chillers for Writelink in 2005 and have to say the standard of writing this year is very much higher than I remember it being back then, but one problem still persists and that is a lack of originality when it comes to dealing with a set theme.

So many of the shortlisted entries sent to me for judging followed the same thought process. The dolls were haunted and/or evil and only came out on Christmas day. When a competition is themed, and you’re given an opening line, it is a good idea to write down the first half a dozen ideas that come into your head. Study the list carefully so that you can remember every one – and then throw the list away because nearly everyone else will have come up with the same initial ideas. It’s only after you’ve exhausted the obvious that the original arrives.

So, when I chose my own personal shortlist I looked for something different. I tried to find stories where the author had used the theme and/or opening line in an original or slightly different way to the others.

First place went to Voices in the Night – this was my final choice as winner purely and simply because it was a well-written story with considerable originality in use of theme and the way the opening line led into something different. An old man in this story is about to die and wants to discuss with his son something that has troubled him since his own childhood. The son is dismissive of his father’s concerns and it is only at the end, when it is probably too late, that he realises his own child is in danger.

Second was The Interview – I enjoyed this very much indeed. The simplicity of the story telling made it a delight to read and had it been just a little creepier I might have pushed it into first place.

Third was A Present for Mungo – I liked the way the author turned the proposed victim into the aggressor. The fear factor dipped just a touch because the storyline and twist was a little predictable, but the author still handled the ending very well.

My three Highly Commended picks were: Living Doll, Soldier, Soldier and A Christmas Wish – all three of these were very close to making it through to the winners’ spots.

Commended: Vessel for Vengeance and Fractured

Unfortunately, in too many of the stories, there were punctuation errors, commas and full stops in the wrong place or missing apostrophes. An ellipsis is only three dots, no more and no less. I suggest reading your story out loud, as this will help you to pick up on punctuation problems.

It is very sad when a good story doesn’t make it through to the final three because the author hasn’t conducted a thorough proofread prior to submission. If grammar is not a strong point, it’s always worth asking someone else to read your work.

Apart from the nitpicks of poor punctuation and grammar, I have to say I enjoyed all of the stories. Some were better than others, but each and every one was worthy of being shortlisted and my job of choosing the final selection was very difficult indeed.

TINSEL TALES
FLASH FICTION
CONTEST.
DETAILS HERE

DIDN’T MAKE THE SHORT LIST? HERE’S A FEW COMMENTS THAT MIGHT HELP ...
As ever, the Christmas Chillers attracted a very large entry with all 100 places taken just before the closing date. Of these well over 80 returned entries which made it our biggest contest to date!

If you didn’t make the short list it was probably for one of these reasons.

  • Grammatical and spelling errors. Not nearly as bad as in previous years, but several entries were obviously first drafts and a few others showed a glaring lack of proof reading. Incredibly we had two entries that changed the names of characters part way through their story!
  • Rule breaking. Word count in all cases was correctly adhered to, but no less than six entries forgot to add a title! The rules called for this and a clever title will catch a judge’s eye and make them pay closer attention to the story, certainly something to be aimed for when they may be jaded with the twentieth version of the same theme!
  • Originality. Don’t want to say much on this as Lorraine has all ready covered it. Suffice to say, if you are going to stick with the obvious, you need to make sure that your story says it better than all the others. A lot of the entries that went on the short list made it because they were better written and contained less errors than non-short listed entries. In some cases the difference between them was small.
  • Anecdotal. This seems to be quite a common failing amongst newer fiction writers. Put very simply, a good short story should involve conflict leading to change for at least one of the characters. The readers emotions need to be invoked, (in this case fear!) and an ending needs to be achieved that is both satisfying and acceptable. Many of the non-short listed stories were quite obviously anecdotal. 

If you think you are falling into this trap, spend some time reading winning entries to as many fiction contests as possible. A good place to start is Writelink’s current on-line flash fiction contest, www.writelink.co.uk/tinseltales.

There are quite a few 250 word stories all ready posted of varying standards. Read them carefully and you will soon see which are anecdotal and which qualify as proper short stories and it’s not necessary the ones with the most votes!

READ THE WINNING ENTRY
 CLICK HERE

TINSEL TALES
FLASH FICTION
CONTEST.
DETAILS HERE

DON’T FORGET WRITELINK
ALSO RUNS A FREE, MEMBERS ONLY MONTHLY COMPETITION!
LATEST DETAILS HERE:

http://www.writelink.co.uk/arenacomps

BACK TO WRITELINK

TINSEL TALES
FLASH FICTION
CONTEST.
DETAILS HERE